Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Erythema nodosum secondary to type 2 reaction as a manifestation of lepromatous leprosy. A case report

Eritema nudoso secundario a reacción tipo 2 como manifestación de lepra lepromatosa. Un reporte de caso




Section
Case Reports

How to Cite
Chaves, W., Castro, C., Garzón, K. C., Fontalvo, M. T., Viracacha, G. C., Ruano, C. A., & Suárez, J. A. (2016). Erythema nodosum secondary to type 2 reaction as a manifestation of lepromatous leprosy. A case report. Journal of Medicine and Surgery Repertoire, 25(4), 241-246. https://revistas.fucsalud.edu.co/index.php/repertorio/article/view/110

doi
Dimensions
PlumX
license

   

Walter Chaves
    Carlos Castro
      Kenny Carolina Garzón
        MAria Teresa Fontalvo
          Germán Camilo Viracacha
            Camilo Andrés Ruano
              José Arnoldo Suárez

                Introduction: Erythema nodosum leprosum, or type 2 leprosy reaction, is a type III humoral immunological reaction in the lepromatous and borderline categories of the disease This classically presents as painful subcutaneous nodules on the skin, and other systemic manifestations. In this case report, a typical form of this type of leprosy reaction will be shown.
                Case presentation: A 28year-old male patient diagnosed and being treated for multibacillary lepromatous leprosy, was referred to the San Jose Hospital one month after onset. He presented with clinical symptoms such as fever, malaise, weight loss, and increased nodular lesions in the upper limbs, with additional finding of bi-cytopenia and severe neutropenia. He was evaluated by the Dermatology Department during his hospital stay, where he was diagnosed with erythema nodosum leprosum and began treatment for it. A further improvement was observed in the neutropenia, with an increase in leucocytosis. The presence of blasts was found in the peripheral blood smears, which led to the suspicion that the patient had a haemato-lymphoid disease. This was evaluated by the haematology department, but was ruled out. Therefore, this condition corresponded to a leukemoid reaction, probably secondary to the underlying disease. Finally, the patient progressed well and was discharged without complications.
                Conclusions: Type 2 leprosy reaction is an immune reaction mediated by the immunecomplex that occurs typically as painful subcutaneous nodules on the skin, in addition to the associated constitutional symptoms and damage to other organs such as liver, kidney and bone marrow. Knowledge of leprosy reactions, and their timely diagnosis and treatment are essential in preventing morbidity and mortality in these patients.


                Article visits 1319 | PDF visits 229


                Downloads

                Download data is not yet available.

                1. Kamath S, Vaccaro S, Rea T, Ochoa M. Recognizing and managing the immunologic reactions in leprosy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:795–803.

                2. WHO. Weekly epidemiological record. Global leprosy updated, 2013; reducing disease burden. 2014. [consultado 10 Sep 2014] Disponible en: http://www.who.int/wer/2014/wer8936.pdf?ua = 1.

                3. INS. Protocolo de vigilancia en salud pública. Lepra. Colombia. 2014. [consultado 10 Sep 2014] Disponible en: http://www.ins.gov.co/lineas-de-accion/subdireccionvigilancia/sivigila/protocolos%20sivigila/pro%20lepra.pdf.

                4. OPS. En el día mundial de la lucha contra la lepra. Colombia. 2013. [consultado 10 Sep 2014] Disponible en: http://www.paho.org/col/index.php?option = com content&view = article&id = 1781:en-el-dia-mundial-de-la-lucha-contra-la-lepra-&Itemid = 487.

                5. Walker SL, Balagon M, Darlong J, Doni SN, Hagge DA, Halwai V, et al. ENLIST 1: An International Multi-centre Cross-sectional Study of the Clinical Features of Erythema Nodosum Leprosum. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0004065. Epub 2015/09/10.

                6. Ernst JD. Leprosy (Hansen’s disease). En: Goldman L, Ausiello D, editores. Cecil Medicine. 24th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2011. p. 1950–4.

                7. Hartzell JD, Zapor M, Peng S, Straight T. Leprosy: a case series and review. South Med J. 2004;97:1252–6. Epub 2005/01/14.

                8. INS. Guía de atención de la lepra. Colombia. 2007. [consultado 10 Sep 2014] Disponible en: http://www.nacer.udea.edu.co/pdf/libros/guiamps/guias18.pdf.

                9. Renault CA, Ernst JD. Mycobacterium leprae (leprosy). En: Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ, editores. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2015. p. 3165–76.

                10. Pulido A, Mendoza M, Avilés J, Suárez R. Eritema nudoso leproso y reacción de reversión en 2 casos de lepra importada. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2013;104:915–9.

                11. Ramien ML, Wong A, Keystone JS. Severe refractory erythema nodosum leprosum successfully treated with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor etanercept. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52:e133–5. Publicación electrónica 5-2- 2011.

                12. Voorend CG, Post EB. A systematic review on the epidemiological data of erythema nodosum leprosum, a type 2 leprosy reaction. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7:e2440. Epub 2013/10/08.

                13. Walker SL, Waters MF, Lockwood DN. The role of thalidomide in the management of erythema nodosum leprosum. Lep Rev. 2007;78:197–215. Epub 2007/11/27.

                14. Martiniuk F, Giovinazzo J, Tan A, Shahidullah R, Haslett P, Kaplan G, et al. Lessons of leprosy: The emergence of TH17 cytokynes during type II reactions (ENL) is teaching us about T-cell Plasticity. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11:626–30. Epub 2012/04/25.

                Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |