Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Radical hysterectomy cervical cancer

Histerectomía radical por cáncer de cuello uterino




Section
Review Articles

How to Cite
Mora, E., Gallego, P. A., Fuentes, J. S., & Mujer y Neoplasia, G. de I. (2018). Radical hysterectomy cervical cancer. Journal of Medicine and Surgery Repertoire, 27(1), 2-6. https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v27.n1.2018.124

Dimensions
PlumX
license

   

Edmundo Mora
    Paula Andrea Gallego
      Juan Sebastián Fuentes
        Grupo de Investigación Mujer y Neoplasia

          Objective: To describe postoperative outcomes after radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients, between June 2007 and June 2017 at Hospital de San José in Bogotá. Materials and Methods: a retrospective review of radical abdominal hysterectomies for treating FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stages IA2-IIA1 cervical cancer. Variables included clinical and pathologic features, and complications. Results: A total of 70 patients with mean age 45.5 years (SD 11.1) were included. Histology confirmed squamous cell carcinoma in 84.3% (n= 59) and adenocarcinoma in 15.7% (n=11). Average estimated blood loss was 700 cc (from 50 - 1000 cc, transfusion index was 12.9%, 9 patients). Intraoperative complications presented in 7 patients (9.9%) and included vascular injury in 5 patients, ureteral injury in one patient and serosal injury to sigmoid colon in one patient. Positive
          surgical margins were detected in 7 patients (10%), lymph node metastases in 5 patients (8.6%) and parametrial involvement in 3 patients (4.3%). Tumor size was < 2 cm in 42 patients (60%), stromal invasion <1/3 in 42 patients (62.3%) and lymph node and vascular invasion in 18 patients (25.7%). One patient developed postoperative wound infection (1.4%), 3 presented bladder dysfunction (4.3%) and 23 required radiotherapy (32.8%). Conclusions: open radical surgery at Hospital San José includes an important volume of radical hysterectomies, comparable to that reported by other institutions with a similar complication rate.


          Article visits 2184 | PDF visits 945


          Downloads

          Download data is not yet available.

          1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, et al. GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11 Lyon, France: International
          Agency for Research on Cancer; 2013 [cited 2014]. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr.
          2. Landoni F, Maneo A, Colombo A, Placa F, Milani R, Perego P, et al. Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Lancet. 1997;350(9077):535-40.
          3. Trimbos JB, Franchi M, Zanaboni F, Velden J, Vergote I. 'State of the art' of radical hysterectomy; current practice in European oncology centres. Eur J Cancer. 2004;40(3):375-8.
          4. Doll KM, Donnelly E, Helenowski I, Rosenbloom L, Small W, Schink JC, et al. Radical Hysterectomy Compared With Primary Radiation for Treatment of Stage IB1 Cervix Cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2012.
          5. Dursun P, Gultekin M, Ayhan A. The history of radical hysterectomy. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15(3):235-45.
          6. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Fusco A, Malzoni C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(5):1316-23.
          7. Monzon O, Rendon G, Echeverri L, Pareja R. Complicaciones asociadas a histerectomía radical con linfadenectomía pélvica en mujeres con cáncer de cérvix en el Instituto de Cancerología –Clínica Las Américas, Medellín, Colombia. Estudio de cohorte Revista Colombiana de Ginecología y Obstetricia2013. p. 46-52.
          8. Taylor SE, McBee WC, Richard SD, Edwards RP. Radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy. JSLS. 2011;15(2):213-7.
          9. Pikaart DP, Holloway RW, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ, Bigsby GE, Ortiz BH, et al. Clinical-pathologic and morbidity analyses of Types 2 and 3 abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107(2):205-10.
          10. Landoni F, Maneo A, Zapardiel I, Zanagnolo V, Mangioni C. Class I versus class III radical hysterectomy in stage IB1-IIA cervical cancer. A prospective randomized study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(3):203-9.
          11. Fanning J, Hilgers RD, Palabrica C. Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;55(2):179-84.
          12. Covens A, Rosen B, Gibbons A, Osborne R, Murphy J, DePetrillo A, et al. Differences in the morbidity of radical hysterectomy between gynecological oncologists. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;51(1):39-45.
          13. Frumovitz M, Sun CC, Schmeler KM, Deavers MT, Dos Reis R, Levenback CF, et al. Parametrial involvement in radical hysterectomy specimens for women with early-stage cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(1):93-9.
          14. Suprasert P, Srisomboon J, Charoenkwan K, Siriaree S, Cheewakriangkrai C, Kietpeerakool C, et al. Twelve years experience with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(3):294-8.
          15. Ryu SY, Kim MH, Nam BH, Lee TS, Song ES, Park CY, et al. Intermediate-risk grouping of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(2):278-85.
          16. Piver MS, Ghomi A. The twenty-first century role of Piver- Rutledge type III radical hysterectomy and FIGO stage IA, IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer in the era of robotic surgery: a personal perspective. J Gynecol Oncol. 2010;21(4):219-24.
          17. Sedlis A, Bundy BN, Rotman MZ, Lentz SS, Muderspach LI, Zaino RJ. A randomized trial of pelvic radiation therapy versus no further therapy in selected patients with stage IB carcinoma of the cervix after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73(2):177-83.
          18. Zullo MA, Manci N, Angioli R, Muzii L, Panici PB. Vesical dysfunctions after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2003;48(3):287-93.
          19. Fei-Chi C, Hann-Chorng K. Urological Complications of Radical Hysterectomy for Uterine Cervical Cancer. Incont Pelvic Floor Dysfunct2007. p. 77-80.

          Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |