Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Concordance between virtual and conventional films in cervicovaginal cytology

Concordancia entre láminas virtuales y convencionales en citología cervicovaginal




Section
Research Article

How to Cite
Tovar Díaz, D. I., Vega Duarte, K. V., Archila, M. del P., Córdoba, C. C., & Miranda Cortés, D. P. (2007). Concordance between virtual and conventional films in cervicovaginal cytology. Journal of Medicine and Surgery Repertoire, 16(2), 76-80. https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v16.n2.2007.463

Dimensions
PlumX
license

   

Diana Ibeth Tovar Díaz
    Karen Viviana Vega Duarte
      María del Pilar Archila
        Carol Constanza Córdoba
          Diana Patricia Miranda Cortés

            The virtual sheets are presented as a new technique and tool in the interpretation of the CCV. This research project seeks to establish the existing agreement between the diagnosis made through LV and that made in LC. It was attended by four pathologists and two cytologists, who analyzed 98 sheets by the two methods. For the analysis of the LV, the kadiview computer program was designed, where the photodigital images of the most representative fields of each LC and the clinical data of the patient are located. The coefficient of agreement kappa for the general classification of negative and positive for neoplasia in the conventional diagnoses. virtual was 0.63, indicating a good match. The kappa coefficient obtained when analyzing the diagnostic categories within the positive for neoplasia, was 0.55, representing a moderate concordance. In addition, through a survey it was established that the kadiview program can become a very useful tool for diagnosis in LV due to its characteristics of presentation of photos and clinical data. All of the above allows to establish that VL can be an alternative method and very useful in the successful diagnosis of CCV, using a program such as kadiview. Abbreviations: CCV, cervicovaginal cytology; LC, conventional sheets; LV, virtual sheets.


            Article visits 206 | PDF visits 204


            Downloads

            Download data is not yet available.

            1. Gagnon M, Inhorn S, Hancock J, Keller B, Carpenter D, Merlin T, et al. Comparison of cytology proficiency testing: glass slides vs. virtual slides.Acta Cytol. 2004 Nov-Dec; 48(6): 788-94.

            2. Demichelis F, Barbareschi M, Dalla Palma P, Forti S. The virtual case: a new method to completely digitize cytological and histological slides. Virchows Arch. 2002 Aug; 441(2):159-64. Epub 2001 Dec 12.

            3. Marchevsky AM, Wan Y, Thomas P, Krishnan L, EvansSimon H, Haber H. Virtual microscopy as a tool for proficiency testing in cytopathology: a model using multiple digital images of Papanicolau tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2003 Oct; 127(10):1320-4.

            4. Taylor RN, Gagnon M, Lange J, Lee T, Draut R, Kujawski E. Cyto View: a prototype computer image-based Papanicolaou smear proficiency test. Acta Cytol. 1999 Nov-Dec; 43(6):1045-51.

            5. Cicchetti, D.V, Fleiss, J.L. Comparison of the null distribution of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977; 1: 195-201.

            6. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977 Mar; 33(1): 159-74.

            7. Costello SS, Johnston DJ, Dervan PA, O'Shea DG. Development and evaluation of the virtual pathology slide: a new tool in telepathology. J Med Internet Res. 2003 Apr-Jun; 5(2): e11.

            8. Weinstein RS, Descour MR, Liang C, Barker G, Scott KM, Richter L, et al. An array microscope for ultrarapid virtual slide processing and telepathology. Design, fabrication, and validation study. Hum Pathol. 2004 Nov; 35(11): 1303-14.

            Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |