Cytohistology in phytology and phytopathology

Citohistología en fitología y fitopatología

The main objective of this publication is to disseminate knowledge on histology as the science that studies the structure, development and physiology of all organic tissues. Currently this technique is dedicated to human tissue processing as performed by cytohistology technicians. It is important that cytohistology becomes useful in botany as the science that studies vegetal tissue and its influence on the environment. It would be an excellent field of action for cytotech­ nologists due to the daily emphasis placed on environmental importance and current ongoing concern on a thorough understanding on phytology and its various pathologies, in order to support biologists, phytologists, phytopathologists and agricultura( engineers, as well as, participating in research projects on different plants in vegetal evolution, whose microscopic features will serve as applicable selection tools to improve crops or endangered vegetal species.

1. Montalvo Arenas CE. Técnica histológica [monografía en Internet]. México: FACMED: 2010. [citado 22 Jun 2012] . Disponible en: http://www.facmed. unam.mx/deptos/biocetis/Doc/Repaso_I/Apuntes%20bloque%20!/3_tecnica_ histologica.pdf
2. Kourie J, Goldsmith MH. K channels are responsible for an inwardly rectifying current in the plasma membrane of mesophyll protoplasts of Avenasatiua. PlantPhysiol. 1992 Mar; 98(3):1087-97.
3. Zeiger E, Taiz L. Fisiología vegetal. 3' ed. Castello de la Plana, España: Univer­ sitat Jaume; 2006.
4. MontuengaBadia L, Esteban Ruiz F, Clavo González A. Técnicas en histología y biología celular. Barcelona, España: Elsevier :Masson, c2009.
5. Becerra N. Marquinez X, Barrera TE. Anatomía y morfología de los órganos vegetativos de las plantas vasculares. I' ed. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional. Fa­ cultad de Ciencias; 2002.
6. Programa de la signatura organografía microscópica. [monografía en Internet]. España: Universidad de Extremadura. Facultad de Ciencias; 2010. [citado 22 Jun 2012]. Disponible enhttp://ciencias.unex.es/titulaciones/biologia/progra­ mas_asignaturas_curso_proximo/2_organografia_microscopica.pdf
7. Raven PH, Evert RF, Eichhorn SE. Biología de las plantas. Barcelona, España: Reverte;1992.
8. De Barros CS, Driemeier D, Pilati C, Barros SS, Castilhos LML. Seneciospp. poisoning in cattle in outhern Brazil. Vet. Hum. Toxico!. 1992; 34(3):241-46.
9. Sandoval E. Técnicas aplicadas al estudio de la anatomía vegetal. I' ed. México: UNAM. Instituto de Biología; 2005.
10. RomaniucNeto S, Wanderley MGL. Flora fanerogiimica da reserva do Parque Estadual das Fontes do Ipiranga (Slio Paulo, Brasil): 19 - Moraceae. Hoehnea. 1992; 19:165-69.
11. González Rebollar JL, Chueca Sancho A. C4 y CAM: Características generales y uso en programas de desarrollo de tierras áridas y semiáridas. Madrid : Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas : Fundación Ramón Areces, 2010.
12. Paviani T. 1978. Anatomía vegetal do cerrado. Cien Cult. 1978; 30:1076-86.
13. O'Brien TP, Feder N, McCully ME. Polychromatic staning of plant cell walls by toluidine blue O. Protoplasma. 1964; 59: 367-73.
14. Condon AG, Richards RA, Rebetzcle GJ, Farquhar GD. Improving intrinsic water - use efficiency and crop yield. Crop Sci. 2002; 42: 122-31.
15. Farquhar GD, Ehleringer JR, Hubick KT. Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Planl Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1989; 40:503-37.
16. Gerrits PO, Horobin R. The application of glycol metacrylate in histotechnology; sorne fundamental principies. Netherlands: State University of Groningen. De­ partment of Anatomy and Embryology;1991.
17. Hibberd JM, Quick WP. Characteristics of C4 photosyntesis in stems and petio­ les of C3 flowering plants. Nature. 2002; 415:451-54.
18. Johansen DA. Plant microtechique. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1940.
19. Lawlor DW. Photosyntesis: molecular, physiological and environmental proces­ ses. 3rded. New York: Springer Verlag; 2001.
20. Stenberg L. DeNiroMJ,Ting IP. Carbon, hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios of cellulose from plants having intermediary photosynthetic modes. Plant Physiol. 1984; 74:104-7.
21. Souza LA, Rosa SM. Morfo-anatomía do fruto emdesenvolvimento de Soroceabonplandii(Baill.) Burger, Lanjow and Boer (Moraceae). Acta sci., Biol. Sci. 2005; 27:423-28.
22. Maniatis T, Fristch EF, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. New York: Cold Spring Harbour laboratory; 1989.
23. White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor JW. An1plification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Genfald DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applica­ tions. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1990.
24. Zervakis GI, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R. Molecular phylogeny, biogeography and speciation of the mushroom species Pleurotuscystidiosus and allied taxa. Micro­ bio!. 2004;150: 715-26.
25. Berlyn GP, Miksche JP. Botanical microtechnique and citochemistry. Ames: The lowa State University Press; 1976.
26. Stevens A. The haematoxylins. In: Bancroft ID, Steves A, editors. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
27. Carson FL. Histotechnology: a self instructional text. Chicago, IL : American Society of Clinical; 1997.
28. Kiernan JA. Histological &Histochemical Methods.4th ed. Bloxham, UK, Scion Publishing; 2008.
29. Rawlins TE, Takahashi WN. 1952. Technics of plant histochemistry and virolo­ gy. Millbrae: The National Press; 1952.
30. Sass JE. Botanical microtechnique. Ames: Iowa State Collage Press; 1951.
31. Souza LA, Rosa SM, Moscheta IS, Mourao KSM, Rodella RA, Rocha DC, Lolis MIGA. Morfología e anatomía vegetal - técnicas e prácticas. Uvaranas, Brasil: Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa; 2005.
32. Titford M. A short history of histopathology technique. J Histotechnol. 2006; 29:99-110.
33. 8racegirdle 8. A History of microtechnique. 2nd ed. Lincolnwood, IL: Science Heritage;1986.
34. Clark G, Kasten FH. History of Staining. 3rd ed. 8altimore: Williams and Wil­ kins; 1983.
35. Dapson RW. The history, chemistry and modes of action of carnline and related dyes. 8iotech Histochemical. 2007; 82:173-187.
36. Culling CFA. Handbook of histopathologicaltechiques. 2nd ed. London: 8ut­ terworths; 1963.
37. Sheehan DC, Hrapchak 88. Theory and practice of histotechnology. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1980.
38. Titford M. The long history of hematoxilina. 8iotech Histochem. 2005; 80:73- 78.
39. Wittekind DH. Romanowsky-Giemsa stains. In: Horobin RW, Kiernan JA, edi­ tors. Conn's biological stains. JOthed. Oxford: 8ios Scientific Publishers; 2002. p 308.
40. Drury RA8, Wallington EA. Carlenton's histological technique. 4thed. New York, Oxford University Press; 1967.
41. Mauseth JD. Plant anatomy. Menlo Park, California: The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company;1988.
42. 8ayliss High 08. Lipids. In: 8ancroft JD, Steves A, editors. Theory and practice of histological techniques.4th ed. ew York: Churchill Livingstone; 1990.
43. Henwood A. Current applications of orcein in histochemistry. a brief review with sorne new observations conceming influence of dye batch variation and aging of dye solutions on staining. Biotech Histochem. 2003; 78:303-308.
44. Evert RF. Esau's Plant anatomy (rneristems, cells, and tissues of the plant body: their structure, function, and development). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
45. Gatenby JB, 8eams HW. The microtomist's vade-mecum (Bolles Lee). 11 th ed. Philadelphia: The 8!akeston Company; 1950.
46. Pearse AGE. Histochemistry-theoretical and applied. 3rd ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1968.
47. Anderson G, Bancroft JD. Tissue processing and microtomy including frozen. ln: 8ancroft JD, Gamble M, editors. Theory and practice of histological techniques, 5th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2002. pp. 85 - 107.
48. Bancroft JD, Cook HC. Manual of histological techniques and their diagnostic application. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1994.
49. Carson FL. Histotechnology, a self-instructional text, 2nd ed. Chicago: ASCP Press; 1997. Maihisot MA. Microtomy. lt's ali about technique! (workshop handout). 8owie, MD: National Society for Histotechnology; 2005.
51. Rodrigues A, Menezes M. Detec9ao de fungos endofíticosemsementes de caupi provenientes de Serra Talhada e de Caruaru, Estado de Pernambuco. Fitopatol. 8ras. 2002; 27(5): 532-37.