Duration of the microbial barrier provided by a woven cotton wrap of surgical instruments sterilized with moist heat

Duración de la tela tejida como barrera microbiana en instrumental quirúrgico esterilizado por calor húmedo

Introduction: 100% Pima cotton woven fabric has been the most commonly used wrapping material for medical sur­ gical equipment and supplies sterilized with moist heat, due to its maneuverability, greater resistance to tearing than paper, usefulness for heavy equipment and reutilization. Objective: to describe for how long the double Pima cotton wrapping provides an antimocrobial barrier thus maintaining sterility of surgical instruments sterilized by means of moist heat. Methods: a descriptive study case series of 15 packages wrapped in woven material, which underwent a sterilization cycle with moist heat, collecting 105 screening culture samples from different areas of the packages on days O, 5, 10, 15 and 20. Results: no sequential bacterial growth was evidenced on the layers of the sterilized packages along the 20 days of storage. Nine isolated cultures were positive but were unrelated with other areas of the package and were attributable to factors different to barrier mechanisms.

1. Vankaekenbergh V, WilliemeO.. Surgical drapes, gowns and clean air suits, used as medica! devices for patients, clinical staff and equipment . One year of expe­ rience with EN 13795-3... the perspective of the user. 5th Congress Of Eornac; 2009 April 17-19, Copenhagen : European Committee for Standardization.
2. Colombia. Ministerio de Protección Social. Resolución 02183 de 2004 por la cual por la cual se adopta el Manual de Buenas Prácticas de Esterilización para Prestadores de Servicios de Salud. Diario Oficial, 45.611 (Jul. 9 2004).
3. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Manual de esterilización para centros de salud. Washington D.C: OPS; 2008.
4. American National Standard, Association for the Advancement of Medica\ lns­ trumentation. Processing of reusable surgical textiles for use in health care facili­ ties (ANSI/AAMI ST 65:2000). Arlington, VA: AAMI; 2000.
5. Pinter M.O, Gabriellone M.C. Central de material e esterilizacao. ln: Femandes A, et al. lnfeccao Hospitalar e suas interfaces na área da saúde. Sao Paulo: Athee­ neu, 2000. p. I041 - 1060.
6. Robles, C. Tipos de Empaques para Materiales quirúrgicos prevención de in­ fecciones. Medwave.[Revista en interne!]. 2004 Sep [citado 22 Jun 2012]; 4(8): [aprox. 3 p.] [consultado 2011 Ene 20]. Disponible en: http://www.mednet.cl/ link.cgi/Medwave/Enfermeria/lnstrumentistasACS2003/septiembre2004/2676.
7. Zanon U, Neves J. lnfeccoes Hospitalares: Prevencao, Diagnóstico e Tratamento. Ria de Janeiro: Medsi, 1987.
8. Brito M. Galvao C, Francolin L, Rotta C. Validation of the sterilization process of medica! and hospital devices according to different packaging types. (Idioma original: Portugués). Rev. Bras. Enferm. 2002; 55(4): 414-19.
9. Murray P, Rosenthal K, Pfaller M. Microbiología Médica. 5a ed. Madrid, Espa­ ña: ElsevierMosby; 2006.