Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Complications associated with hysteroscopy

Complicaciones asociadas con la histeroscopia




Section
Review Articles

How to Cite
Cerón, N. A., Collo, A. F., Gacive, M., & Flórez, O. (2019). Complications associated with hysteroscopy. Journal of Medicine and Surgery Repertoire, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v28.n1.2019.872

Dimensions
PlumX
license

   

Nathalia Andrea Cerón
    Andrés Felipe Collo
      Michelle Gacive
        Orlando Flórez

          Objective: to describe the most frequent complications in hysteroscopy, emphasizing the technique with monopolar energy, in comparison with bipolar energy. Methodology: A search was made in the databases ELSEVIER, EBSCO, NCBI, SCIENCEDIRECT, SciELO and PUBMED / MEDLINE, applying formatting MeSH terms “Hysteroscopy” and sub-headings such as “Complications”, “Monopolar energy” and “Bipolar energy”, selecting review articles and original research in English and in English published in the last 5 years. Results: The found findings establish that have a relationship between complications and the type of hysteroscopic intervention that is being carried out by indication, with pain being the most frequent complication associated with the ambulatory hysteroscopy and uterine perforation in surgical hysteroscopy. In contrast, hysteroscopy with monopolar energy reports an increased risk of hyponatremia compared to bipolar energy, and as the only complication. Conclusion: The complications depend on the type and hysteroscopy performed and its indication, hyponatremia being the only complication more prevalent associated with the monopolar energy technique, in relation to bipolar energy.


          Article visits 1687 | PDF visits 968


          Downloads

          Download data is not yet available.

          1. Yeh JS, Crochet JR. Hysteroscopy. Medscape; 2018 [cited Abril 2018]; Available from: https://emedicine.medscape.com/ article/1848258-overview.
          2. Wandurraga N, Rodríguez HO, Miranda ÁD, Castro CG. Histeroscopia oficinal: estado del arte y revisión de la literatura. Repert Med y Cir. 2014;23(4):289-303.
          3. Fernandez H, Gervaise A, Garbin O, Levaillant JM. Histeroscopia quirúrgica. EMC - Ginecología-Obstetricia. 2016;52(2):1-20.


          4. Veersema S. Hysteroscopy and contraception. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2015;29(7):940-50. Epub 2015/05/28.
          5. Castañeda J, Jorge Sarrouf M, Celis A, Pedraza L, Carrera E. Cirugía Mínimamente Invasiva en Ginecología. Bogotá: Federación Latinoamericana de Sociedades de Obstetricia y Ginecología; 2017.
          6. Jiménez JS, Arjona Berral JE. El uso de prostaglandinas en la histeroscopia diagnóstica y quirúrgica. Colombia: Arturo Editores, S.L.; 2016. p. 49.
          7. Stocker L, Umranikar A, Moors A, Umranikar S. An overview of hysteroscopy and hysteroscopic surgery. Obstetrics, Gynaecology & Reproductive Medicine. 2013;23(5):146-53.
          8. Salazar CA, Isaacson KB. Office Operative Hysteroscopy: An Update. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2018;25(2):199- 208. Epub 2017/08/15.
          9. McGurgan PM, McIlwaine P. Complications of hysteroscopy and how to avoid them. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2015;29(7):982-93. Epub 2015/05/06.
          10. Connor M. New technologies and innovations in hysteroscopy. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2015;29(7):951-65. Epub 2015/05/11.
          11. Kolhe S. Setting up of ambulatory hysteroscopy service. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2015;29(7):966-81. Epub 2015/05/17.
          12. Mencaglia L, de Albuquerque Neto LC, Arias Alvarez RA. Manual of Hysteroscopy Diagnostic, Operative and Offi ce Hysteroscopy. Germany: Tuttlingen; 2013.
          13. Committee American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Management of Acute Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Nonpregnant Reproductive-Aged Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(557):891– 6.
          14. Díaz-Yamal IJ, Uscátegui-Diago AM, Castañeda-Castañeda J, Fandiño-Rodríguez CA, Villamil-Pérez JE, Gómez-Corredor F, et al. Seguridad de la histeroscopia oficinal en una unidad de fertilidad. Bogotá, Colombia, 2011-2016. Cohorte retrospectiva. Revista Colombiana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2017;68:186-92.
          15. Zayed SM, Elsetohy KA, Zayed M, Fouda UM. Factors affecting pain experienced during office hysteroscopy. Middle East Fertility Society Journal. 2015;20(3):154-8.
          16. Sepúlveda Agudelo J, Díaz-C G. Detención de la hemorragia uterina anormal en pacientes a quienes se realizó histeroscopia operatoria. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2018;86(1):13-25.
          17. Pålsson M, Sundfeldt K. Síntomas del tracto urinario inferior Paciente informó después de la histerectomía o histeroscopia : un estudio de la calidad Registro sueco de Cirugía Ginecológica. 2017.
          18. Sills ES, Li X, Wood SH, Jones CA. Analysis of surgeries performed after hysteroscopic sterilization as tabulated from 3,803 Essure patient experiences. Obstetrics & gynecology science. 2017;60(3):296-302. Epub 2017/05/24.
          19. Roy KK, Kansal Y, Subbaiah M, Kumar S, Sharma JB, Singh N. Hysteroscopic septal resection using unipolar resectoscope versus bipolar resectoscope: Prospective, randomized study. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2015;41(6):952-6. Epub 2014/12/11.
          20. Tang Ploog L, Albinagorta Olortegui R, Vega Mariátegui N. Histeroscopia quirúrgica: experiencia en una institución privada. Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia. 2015;61:21-6.
          21. Tammam AE, Ahmed HH, Abdella AH, Taha SA. Comparative Study between Monopolar Electrodes and Bipolar Electrodes in Hysteroscopic Surgery. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research
          : JCDR. 2015;9(11):QC11-3. Epub 2015/12/18.
          22. Calabrese S, D DEA, Garuti G. The use of bipolar technology in hysteroscopy. Minerva ginecologica. 2016;68(2):133-42. Epub 2016/03/02.
          23. Roy KK, Metta S, Kansal Y, Kumar S, Singhal S, Vanamail P. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Unipolar Versus Bipolar Hysteroscopic Myomectomy in Infertile Women. Journal of human reproductive sciences. 2017;10(3):185-93. Epub 2017/11/17.
          24. Cobellis L, Castaldi MA, Giordano V, De Franciscis P, Signoriello G, Colacurci N. Is it possible to predict office hysteroscopy failure? European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2014;181:328-33. Epub 2014/09/13.
          25. Capmas P, Pourcelot AG, Giral E, Fedida D, Fernandez H. Office hysteroscopy: A report of 2402 cases. Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction. 2016;45(5):445-50. Epub 2016/04/09.
          26. De Marchi F, Fabris AM, Tommasi L, Nappi L, Saccardi C, Litta P. Accuracy of hysteroscopy made by young residents in detecting endometrial pathologies in postmenopausal women. European journal of gynaecological oncology. 2014;35(3):219-23. Epub 2014/07/06.
          27. Valenzuela-Islas H, Frías-Mendívil M, Luis-Zárate H. Correlación entre hallazgos histeroscópicos y reportes histopatológicos en pacientes con sangrado uterino anormal. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2017;85(11):748-54.
          28. Teran-Alonso MJ, De Santiago J, Usandizaga R, Zapardiel I. Evaluation of pain in office hysteroscopy with prior analgesic medication: a prospective randomized study. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2014;178:123-7. Epub 2014/05/20.
          29. Mazzon I, Favilli A, Grasso M, Horvath S, Bini V, Di Renzo GC, et al. Pain in diagnostic hysteroscopy: a multivariate analysis after a randomized, controlled trial. Fertility and sterility. 2014;102(5):1398-403. Epub 2014/09/23.


          30. de Freitas Fonseca M, Sessa FV, Resende JA, Jr., Guerra CG, Andrade CM, Jr., Crispi CP. Identifying predictors of unacceptable pain at office hysteroscopy. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2014;21(4):586-91. Epub 2014/01/16.
          31. Healy MW, Schexnayder B, Connell MT, Terry N, DeCherney AH, Csokmay JM, et al. Intrauterine adhesion prevention after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2016;215(3):267-75 e7. Epub 2016/05/14.
          32. Petrozza JC. Hysteroscopy Treatment & Management. United State: Medscape 2018 [cited 2018 enero]; Available from: https:// emedicine.medscape.com/article/267021-treatment.
          33. Walker SH, Gokhale L. Safety aspects of hysteroscopy, specifically in relation to entry and specimen retrieval: a UK survey of practice. Gynecological surgery. 2018;15(1):2. Epub 2018/02/02.
          34. Hepp P, Juttner T, Beyer I, Fehm T, Janni W, Monaca E. Rapid correction of severe hyponatremia after hysteroscopic surgery - a case report. BMC anesthesiology. 2015;15:85. Epub 2015/06/09.
          35. Deffieux X, Gauthier T, Menager N, Legendre G, Agostini A, Pierre
          F. Hysteroscopy: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians. European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2014;178:114- 22. Epub 2014/05/20.
          36. YE Yuzhu LL. Dilutional Hyponatremia During Intrauterine Adhesion [Internet]. UKEssays; 2013; Available from: https:// www.ukessays.com/essays/biology/dilutional-hyponatremia- intrauterine-3649.php?vref=1.
          37. Akkaya A, Karatas A, Demirhan A, Ozlu T, Bilgi M, Tekelioglu ÜY, et al. Severe Pulmonary Edema due to Hyponatremia after Hysteroscopy; Rapid and Full Recovery. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2014;3(3):375-7.
          38. Closon F, Tulandi T. Future research and developments in hysteroscopy. Best practice & research Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology. 2015;29(7):994-1000. Epub 2015/05/07.
          39. Ma T, Readman E, Hicks L, Porter J, Cameron M, Ellett L, et al. Is outpatient hysteroscopy the new gold standard? Results from an 11 year prospective observational study. The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 2017;57(1):74-80. Epub 2016/11/20.

          Sistema OJS 3.4.0.5 - Metabiblioteca |