Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Experience at the San José Hospital, Bogotá

Nefrolitotomía percutanea: Experiencia en el Hospital San José, Bogotá

Article Sidebar


PDF (Español (España)) FLIP

How to Cite
Martín D, R., & Torres S, D. (2002). Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Experience at the San José Hospital, Bogotá. Journal of Medicine and Surgery Repertoire, 11(2), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v11.n2.2002.278
Published: Jun 1, 2002
Doi
https://doi.org/10.31260/RepertMedCir.v11.n2.2002.278
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 2 (2002): April - June
Section
Original Articles
License terms

   

Main Article Content

Rocío Martín D
Daniel Torres S

Abstract

In order to evaluate the experience of percutaneous nephrolithotomy at the Hospital de San José de Bogota, 80 cases were reviewed prospectively, registered between March 1997 and October 2000. The analysis included the variables of free percentage of calculation, type of calculations, surgical time, hospital stay and complications. The results showed a free calculation percentage of more than 90% in 76.3% of the cases and a statistically significant relationship between the free percentage of calculus and the types of calculus, as well as its relation with the surgical time. The hospital stay was short, with an average of 3 days, the morbidity was 22.5% and there was no mortality. In this series of cases, percutaneous nephrolithotomy was an effective surgical technique, safe and with rapid recovery, which is why it is the procedure of choice in the treatment of renal lithiasic disease.

Keywords:

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

1. Clayman R, McDougall E, Nakada S. Endourology of the upper urinary tract. Walsh, Retik, Stamey, Vaughan (eds). Campbell's Urology. 7° edición. Estados Unidos de Norteamérica, W.B Sauders company. 1998, pp 2789-874.

2. Saxby MF, Sorahan T, Slaney P, Coppingers SWN. A case-control study of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus estracorporeal schock wave lithotripsy. Br-J-Urol. 1997; 79: 317-23.

3. Wolf JS (Jr), Clayman R. Nefrolitotomía percutánea.¿Cuál es su papel en 1997?. Clin Urol Norte Am. 1997; 1: 47-62.

4. Al-Otaibi K, Hosking D. Percutaneous stone removal in horseshoe kidneys. J Uro . 1999; 162: 674-7.

5. Curtis R, Thope AC, Marsh R. Modification of the technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the morbidly obese patient. Br J Urol. 1997; 79: 138-40.

6. Dushinski JW, Lingerman J. Simultaneous bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1997; 158: 2065-8.

7. Mar Y, Elmasry Y, Kellett M, Duffy PG. The role of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of pediatric renal calculi. J Urol. 1997; 158: 1319-21.

8. Segura Jet al. Percutaneous removal ofkidney stones: Review of 1,000 cases. J Urol. 1985; 134: 1077-81.

9. Gerspach J, Bellman G, Stoller M, Fugelso P. Conservative management of colon injury following percutaneous renal surgery. Urology. 1997; 49: 831-6.

10. Weir M, Honey R. Complete infundibular obliteration following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1999; 161: 1274-5.

11. Cadeddy J. et al. Clinical significance of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 1998; 52: 48-50.

12. Pugach J, Moore R, Parra R, Steinhardt G. Massive hidrotorax and hidroabdomen complicating percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1999; 162: 1210-11.

13. Roth R, Beckmann C. Complications of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1998; 15: 159-65.

14. Lee W et al. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. ARJ. 1987; 148: 177-80.

15. Davidoff R, Bellman G. Influence of technique of percutaneous tract creation on incidente of renal hemorrhage. J Urol. 1997; 157: 1229-31.

16. Stoller M, Wolf S, Lezin M. Estimated blood and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1994; 152: 1977-81.

Citado por