Post-conization residual dysplasia lletz: Analysis of a series of cases

Displacia residual post-conización lletz: Análisis de una serie de casos

Main Article Content

Mario Flórez
Susana Bueno L.
Graciela María Porras
Carlos Pérez

Abstract

A retrospective analytical study of 40 cases taken from a population of 216 patients in which it was possible to carry out a long follow-up of the evolution after the execution of the LLETZ technique (Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone), and which culminated in the performing a hysterectomy indicated as definitive treatment for presenting signs of persistence or recurrence of neoplasia. The objective of the study was to establish the diagnostic and / or therapeutic value of the LLETZ, by determining the persistence of residual dysplasia in the samples obtained in the hysterectomy, comparing said results with those of previous diagnoses (cytology, colposcopy, biopsy, LLETZ and cube). In addition, the possible correlation of the results with age and gestational index was explored. The persistence or recurrence of CIN III determined in the final surgical piece (uterus) was 15%, so cytocolposcopic monitoring is still recommended in patients who undergo LLETZ, but this method is safe because in 57 , 5% of the cases, the result of the hysterectomy was negative and in an additional 27.5%, the degree of the lesion was reduced, compared to that found in the LLEIZ.

Keywords:

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

1. Bornstein J, Yaakov Z, Pascal et al. Decision-making in the colposcopy clinic, a critical analysis. Eur J Obstet and Gynecol Reproduc Biol 1999; 85: 219-24.

2. Ioffe OB, Brooks SE, De Rezende. Artifact in cervical LLETZ specimens: correlation with follow-up. Int J Gynecol-Pathol 1999; 18:115-21.

3. Arends MJ et al. Aetiology. Pathogenesis, and Pathology of cervical neoplasia. J. Clin Pathol 1998; 96-103.

4. Skjeldestad FE et al. Residual and Recurrent Disease after Laser Conization for cervical intraepithelial Neoplasia. Obstetrics Gynecol 1997; 90: 428-33.

5. Gardeil et al. Persistent Intraepithelial Neoplasia after Excision for Cervical Neoplasia Grade HL Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 419-22.

6. Prendiville W, et al. Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone. Clin Obstetrics and Gynecol, 1995.

7. Moore B, Higgins R, et al. Predictive Factors from Cold Knife Conization for Residual Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy. Am J Ostet Gynecol 1995; 361-8.+

8. DK Bigrigg A, Haffenden, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone. Lancet 1994; 343: 32-4.

9. Alarcón S. Fundamentos de Radiocirugía. Academy of Radiosurgery. 1994.

10. Harper. Anesthesic Blocks for Loop electrosurgical excision procedure. J. Fam Pract 1994; 39.

11. Felix J. The Significance of Positive Martgins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet-Gynecol 1994; 84.

12. Naumann RT, Bell MC, Álvarez et al. Lletz is an acceptable alternative to diagnostic cold knife Conization. Gynecol Oncol 1994; 55: 224.

13. Prendville W, Cullimore, et al. large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone (LLETZ). A New Method of management for women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Br. J Obstet. Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1054-60.

Citado por