Doppler hemodynamic changes in fetuses with intrauterine growth retardation of 26-34 weeks at 24 and 48 hours of maternal administration of Betametasone

Cambios hemodinámicos por Doppler en fetos con retardo del crecimiento intrauterino de 26-34 semanas a 24 y 48 horas de la administración materna de Betametasona

Main Article Content

José Luis Rojas
Carol Gisela Rueda
Alfredo Rincón
Oscar Gregorio Coronado

Abstract

Objective: to identify changes in the pulsatility index (PI) of the umbilical and middle cerebral arteries after applying betamethasone in patients with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) between 26 and 34 weeks. Methods: 22 patients hospitalized with single pregnancies between 26 and 34 weeks associated with IUGR, with indications of lung maturation who were not in labor, received complete maturation protocol, initial fetoplacental doppler sampling and at 24 and 48 hours. Results: 68.2% presented hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, 81.8% (n: 18) denied associated chronic disease, no major fetal abnormalities were documented or fetal infection was suspected. The average PI of the umbilical artery at admission was 1.62 (SD 0.41) and of the middle cerebral artery 1.97 (SD 0.61). In the 48-hour Doppler, IP changes were observed in the umbilical (p = 0.0079) and the middle cerebral (p = 0.0149), with respect to the baseline. Conclusions: in IUGR between weeks 26 and 34 there are variations with statistical significance of the IP in the umbilical and medial cerebral arteries Doppler that were not always associated with changes in the current Doppler staging and have no clinical importance. Associated gestational hypertension can be a confounding factor. Abbreviations: IP, pulsatility index: IUGR, delay in intrauterine growth.

Keywords:

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

References

1. Resnik R. Intrauterine growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99(3):490-6.

2. Tan TY, Yeo GS. Intrauterine growth restriction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 17(2):135-42.

3. Mandruzzato G, Antsaklis A, Botet F, Chervenak FA, Figueras F, Grunebaum A, et al. Intrauterine restriction (IUGR). J Perinat Med. 2008; 36(4):277-81.

4. Mulder EJ, de Heus R, Visser GH. Antenatal corticosteroid therapy: short-term effects on fetal behaviour and haemodynamics. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009; 14(3):151-6.

5. Robertson MC, Murila F, Tong S, Baker LS, Yu VY, Wallace EM. Predicting perinatal outcome through changes in umbilical artery Doppler studies after antenatal corticosteroids in the growth-restricted fetus. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar; 113(3):636-40.

6. Miller SL, Chai M, Loose J, Castillo-Melendez M, Walker DW, Jenkin G, et al. The effects of maternal betamethasone administration on the intrauterine growthrestricted fetus. Endocrinology. 2007; 148(3):1288-95.

7. Chauhan SP, Gupta LM, Hendrix NW, Berghella V. Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Apr;200(4):409.e1-6.

8. Ferrazzi E, Bozzo M, Rigano S, Bellotti M, Morabito A, Pardi G, et al. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 19(2):140-6.

9. Maulik D. Fetal growth compromise: definitions, standards, and classification. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49(2):214-8.

10. Maulik D. Fetal growth restriction: the etiology. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49(2):228-35.

11. Maulik D, Frances Evans J, Ragolia L. Fetal growth restriction: pathogenic mechanisms. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 49(2):219-27.

12. Nozaki AM, Francisco RP, Fonseca ES, Miyadahira S, Zugaib M. Fetal hemodynamic changes following maternal betamethasone administration in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction and absent end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88(3):350-4.

13. Thuring A, Malcus P, Marsal K. Effect of maternal betamethasone on fetal and uteroplacental blood flow velocity waveforms. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 37(6):668-72.

Citado por